News Alchemists #5: "Maybe more isn't better. Maybe deeper is better."
This post was originally published on LinkedIn.
5th edition of the News Alchemists newsletter-in-the-making, in which I share 7 readings about change in journalism β and about audience, community and sustainability β that made me think and gave me hope π Because journalism needs to change if we want to heal the broken relationship between our industry and the people we aim to serve β a challenge that will be less daunting if we face it together and learn from one another.
1. Let's think about user needs in community π LINK
By π§Lars K Jensen. (Don't stop at the post: there's gold in the comments.)
2. Could we give audiences a different entry point into a news story? π LINK
By π§Sannuta Raghu of 𧩠Scroll.in.
3. Maybe more isnβt better. Maybe deeper is better. π LINK
The post is not about journalism but made me think: What does βdeeper is betterβ mean for us? How do we use the idea of "critical connections" to catalyse our work towards positive change?
4. Breaking old habits π LINK
π§Andrea Faye Hart's 2025 Prediction for Nieman Journalism Lab
5. The content designer's checklist π LINK
Shared by π§Annemarie Dooling / found through π§Rishad Patel's Splice Frames newsletter (Do yourself a favour and sign up now.)
6. Beyond the splash: measuring impact in a changing world π LINK
By π§Carmen Nicoara of Syli
7. Insights into journalism and advice for student reporters heading into 2025, from ICFJ Knight Fellows π LINK
Collected by IJNet: βThis year, [we have the opportunity] to demonstrate that journalism, as a public service, can also be a sustainable business.β β π§JosΓ© JasΓ‘n Nieves of 𧩠elTOQUE.
Member discussion