2 min read

News Alchemists #5: "Maybe more isn't better. Maybe deeper is better."

This post was originally published on LinkedIn.

5th edition of the News Alchemists newsletter-in-the-making, in which I share 7 readings about change in journalism – and about audience, community and sustainability – that made me think and gave me hope πŸ“š Because journalism needs to change if we want to heal the broken relationship between our industry and the people we aim to serve – a challenge that will be less daunting if we face it together and learn from one another. 

By 🧞Lars K Jensen. (Don't stop at the post: there's gold in the comments.)

2. Could we give audiences a different entry point into a news story? πŸ‘‰ LINK

By 🧞Sannuta Raghu of 🧩 Scroll.in.

The post is not about journalism but made me think: What does β€œdeeper is better” mean for us? How do we use the idea of "critical connections" to catalyse our work towards positive change?

🧞Andrea Faye Hart's 2025 Prediction for Nieman Journalism Lab

Shared by 🧞Annemarie Dooling / found through 🧞Rishad Patel's Splice Frames newsletter (Do yourself a favour and sign up now.)

By 🧞Carmen Nicoara of Syli

Collected by IJNet: ❝This year, [we have the opportunity] to demonstrate that journalism, as a public service, can also be a sustainable business.❞ – 🧞JosΓ© JasΓ‘n Nieves of 🧩 elTOQUE.